Free certification test prep

The EDGE software requires users to select a building type (typology) to model resource consumption accurately, and the choice depends on the scope of the certification. In this scenario, a tenant on the third floor (an office floor) of a medium-rise building seeks EDGE certification. The EDGE User Guide provides guidance on selecting building types for tenant spaces: “When a tenant within a larger building seeks EDGE certification, the building type should reflect the tenant’s space. For an office tenant on the third floor of a mixed-use building, the ‘Office’ typology should be selected, as the certification applies only to the tenant’s space, not the entire building, unless the whole building is being certified” (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.2:
Project Setup). Option A, Office, aligns with this guidance, as the tenant’s space is an office. Option B (Retail) is incorrect, as the retail floors are on the first two levels, not the third: “Retail typology would apply if the tenant space were on the retail floors, not the office floors” (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.2: Project Setup). Option C (Mixed-use) is also incorrect, as this typology applies to the entire building, not a single tenant space: “Mixed-use typology is used when the entire building, including all uses (e.g., retail and offices), is being certified, not for individual tenant spaces” (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section
2.1: Calculation Approach). Option D (Core and Shell) is typically used for buildings certified up to the core and shell stage, not for tenant fit-outs: “Core and Shell typology applies to buildings certified without tenant fit-outs, focusing on the building envelope and systems, not individual tenant spaces like an office” (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 1.2: Scope of EDGE Standard). The EDGE User Guide further clarifies: “For tenant-led certifications, the typology should match the tenant’s use-e.g., ‘Office’ for an office tenant-even if the building has multiple uses, ensuring the Base Case reflects the tenant’s specific consumption patterns” (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.2: Project Setup). Since the tenant on the third floor operates an office, the Office typology (Option A) is the correct choice for EDGE certification.
Reference:EDGE User Guide Version 2.1, Section 2.2: Project Setup; EDGE Methodology Report Version
2.0, Section 2.1: Calculation Approach; EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 1.2: Scope of EDGE Standard.

Variable Refrigerant Volume (VRV) or Variable Refrigerant Flow (VRF) systems are evaluated in EDGE for their energy efficiency in HVAC applications. The EDGE User Guide explains their application: “VRV/VRF systems are best suited for multizone spaces, as they can simultaneously heat and cool different zones by varying the refrigerant flow, making them ideal for buildings with diverse thermal loads, such as hotels, offices, or hospitals with multiple rooms” (EDGE User Guide, Section 4.2: Energy Efficiency Measures).
Option C, multizone space, aligns with this description, as VRV/VRF systems excel in managing varied temperature needs across multiple zones. Option A (single zone space) and Option B (single zone office space) are incorrect, as VRV/VRF systems are less efficient for single zones: “For single zone spaces, simpler systems like split units are more appropriate, as VRV/VRF systems are designed for multizone control” (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.1: Energy Efficiency Metrics). Option D (meeting space) is too specific and typically a single zone, not leveraging VRV/VRF’s multizone capability: “Meeting spaces are often single zones, where VRV/VRF systems may be oversized” (EDGE User Guide, Section 4.2:
EnergyEfficiency Measures). Thus, VRV/VRF systems are best used for multizone spaces (Option C).
Reference:EDGE User Guide Version 2.1, Section 4.2: Energy Efficiency Measures; EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.1: Energy Efficiency Metrics.

EDGE Auditors must adhere to strict protocols ensuring that all claimed measures are supported by verifiable evidence, especially during audits. The EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols state: “If a claimed measure, such as water-efficient faucets, lacks supporting documentation like specifications or manufacturer’s data sheets, the Auditor must exclude the measure from the project assessment. The Auditor is not permitted to test equipment, substitute evidence, or mandate replacements, as their role is to verify, not rectify, the Client’s submission” (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 4.2: Evidence Verification). Option A, exclude the faucets from the project, aligns with this protocol, as the lack of specifications prevents verification. Option B (test the faucets’ flow rates) is incorrect, as Auditors cannot conduct tests: “Auditors are not responsible for testing equipment; they must rely on provided documentation” (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.2:
Audit Requirements). Option C (require the owner to replace the faucets) oversteps the Auditor’s role:
“Auditors cannot mandate changes to the project; they assess what is submitted” (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.3: Conflict of Interest). Option D (find a product with the same parameters) is also prohibited: “Auditors cannot substitute or assume evidence on behalf of the Client” (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 4.2: Evidence Verification). Thus, the Auditor should exclude the faucets (Option A).
Reference:EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 4.2: Evidence Verification, Section 2.3: Conflict of Interest; EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.2: Audit Requirements.

The Coefficient of Performance (COP) is used in EDGE to calculate the electrical power input required for a given thermal output of a chiller. The EDGE Methodology Report defines COP as: “COP is the ratio of thermal output to electrical input, expressed as COP = Thermal Output / Electrical Input. To find the electrical input (power rating), rearrange the formula: Electrical Input = Thermal Output / COP” (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.1: Energy Efficiency Metrics). Given the COP of the water-cooled chiller as 6 and the cooling thermal load (thermal output) as 3516 W, the power rating is calculated as follows: Electrical Input = 3516 W / 6 = 586 W. Option A, 586 W, matches this calculation. Option B (3510 W) is incorrect, as it is slightly less than the thermal output, implying an unrealistic COP near 1. Option C (3522 W) is slightly above the thermal output, also incorrect. Option D (21096 W) is the result of multiplying the thermal output by the COP (3516 × 6), which is the inverse of the correct calculation. The EDGE User Guide confirms: “For a chiller with a COP of 6, the electrical input is one-sixth of the thermal output, ensuring energy efficiency is accurately assessed” (EDGE User Guide, Section 4.2: Energy Efficiency Measures). Thus, the power rating is
586 W (Option A).
Reference:EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.1: Energy Efficiency Metrics; EDGE User Guide Version 2.1, Section 4.2: Energy Efficiency Measures.

Embodied carbon in EDGE refers to the carbon emissions associated with the production, transportation, and installation of building materials, a key metric for materials efficiency. The EDGE User Guide specifies how this is measured: “In the EDGE software, the embodied carbon of materials is quantified in kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent (kgCO2), reflecting the total greenhouse gas emissions associated with the material’ s lifecycle, from extraction to installation”(EDGE User Guide, Section 7.2: Materials Efficiency Measures).
Option A, kgCO2, directly matches this unit, as EDGE uses kgCO2 to standardize carbon emissions across materials, allowing for comparison and aggregation in the software’s results. Option B (MJ) is incorrect, as MJ (megajoules) measures embodied energy, not carbon: “Embodied energy in EDGE is measured in MJ, representing the energy consumed in material production, while embodied carbon is separately calculated in kgCO2 to assess environmental impact” (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 6.1: Embodied Energy in Materials). Option C (BTU) is also incorrect, as BTU (British Thermal Units) is an energy unit not used in EDGE for carbon calculations: “EDGE uses metric units like MJ for energy and kgCO2 for carbon; BTU is not a standard unit in the software” (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.3: Using the EDGE App). Option D (kWh) is another energy unit, typically used for operational energy, not embodied carbon: “kWh is used in EDGE to measure operational energy consumption, such as electricity use, but not for embodied carbon, which is always in kgCO2” (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.2: Energy Calculation Methods). The EDGE User Guide further clarifies: “The software displays embodied carbon in kgCO2 to align with global carbon accounting standards, enabling users to understand the environmental footprint of their material choices” (EDGE User Guide, Section 7.2: Materials Efficiency Measures). The EDGE Methodology Report adds: “For example, concrete might have an embodied carbon of 0.15 kgCO2 per kg, allowing users to compare materials like fly ash concrete versus standard concrete in terms of carbon impact” (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 6.1: Embodied Energy in Materials). Thus, the unit of embodied carbon in EDGE is kgCO2 (Option A).
Reference:EDGE User Guide Version 2.1, Section 7.2: Materials Efficiency Measures, Section 2.3: Using the EDGE App; EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 6.1: Embodied Energy in Materials, Section
5.2: Energy Calculation Methods.

The issuance of certificates in the EDGE certification process is a defined responsibility assigned to specific roles. The EDGE Certification Protocol states: “The EDGE Preliminary Certificate, awarded at the design stage, is issued by the EDGE Certification Provider after the Auditor submits a recommendation for certification based on the design audit. The Certification Provider reviews the Auditor’s report and, if compliant, issues the certificate” (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.3: Certification Decision). Option C, Certification Provider, aligns with this process, as entities like GBCI are responsible for issuing certificates. Option A (Auditor) is incorrect, as Auditors only recommend certification: “The Auditor’s role is to provide a recommendation, not to issue the certificate” (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.2:
Roles of EDGE Auditor). Option B (Expert) is also incorrect, as Experts advise on design, not certification:
“EDGE Experts assist with project design and self-assessment, not certification issuance” (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.1: Roles of EDGE Expert). Option D (Operations and Management Team) is wrong, as this team supports the overall program, not individual certifications: “The EDGE Operations and Management Team oversees program development, not certificate issuance” (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 1.3: Program Structure). Thus, the Preliminary Certificate is issued by the Certification Provider (Option C).
Reference:EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.3: Certification Decision, Section 1.3: Program Structure; EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.1: Roles of EDGE Expert, Section 2.2: Roles of EDGE Auditor.

The Coefficient of Performance (COP) is a critical metric in EDGE for assessing the energy efficiency of chillers, a common green building design element. The EDGE Methodology Report defines COP for electrical chillers: “The Coefficient of Performance (COP) of an electrical chiller is defined as the ratio of thermal output (cooling provided, measured in kW) to electrical input (power consumed, measured in kW). A higher COP indicates greater efficiency, as more cooling is produced per unit of electricity” (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.1: Energy Efficiency Metrics). Option B, thermal output / electrical input, matches this definition directly. Option A (thermal output / thermal input) is incorrect, as it applies to heat- driven systems like absorption chillers, not electrical ones. Option C (electrical input / thermal output) inverts the ratio, representing the inverse of COP. Option D (electrical output / electrical input) is irrelevant, as chillers produce thermal output, not electrical output. The EDGE User Guide reinforces this: “For air-cooled and water-cooled chillers, COP is calculated as thermal output divided by electrical input to evaluate energy efficiency” (EDGE User Guide, Section 4.2: Energy Efficiency Measures).
Reference:EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.1: Energy Efficiency Metrics; EDGE User Guide Version 2.1, Section 4.2: Energy Efficiency Measures.

Water consumption in hotels varies significantly based on usage patterns, with guest-related activities often dominating the water use breakdown. The EDGE User Guide provides detailed insights into water use in hotels: “In a typical 3-star business hotel, the largest contributor to water consumption is showers in guest rooms, accounting for approximately 40-50% of total water use due to frequent guest showers, especially in urban hotels with high occupancy. Laundry, toilets, and faucets also contribute, but to a lesser extent, with laundry at 15-20%, toilets at 10-15%, and faucets at 5-10%” (EDGE User Guide, Section 5.2: Water Efficiency Measures). Option A, showers in guest rooms, aligns with this breakdown as the element likely to consume the most water. Option B (laundry) is significant but lower than showers: “Laundry in 3-star hotels consumes less water than showers, as laundry is typically centralized and less frequent than daily guest showers” (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 4.2: Water Savings Calculations). Option C (toilets in lobby area) is a minor contributor, as lobby toilets serve fewer users compared to guest rooms:
“Toilets in public areas like the lobby have lower usage compared to guest room facilities, contributing only a small fraction of total water use in hotels” (EDGE User Guide, Section 5.2: Water Efficiency Measures).
Option D (faucets in guest rooms) also uses less water than showers: “Faucets in guest rooms, used for handwashing or brushing teeth, have lower flow rates and usage frequency compared to showers, which often run for 5-10 minutes per use” (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 4.2: Water Savings Calculations). The EDGE User Guide further elaborates: “In business hotels, showers dominate water use due to high occupancy and guest behavior, making measures like low-flow shower heads particularly effective for water savings” (EDGE User Guide, Section 5.2: Water Efficiency Measures). The EDGE Methodology Report adds: “For a 3-star hotel with 100 rooms and 70% occupancy, showers can account for 45 liters per guest per day, compared to 15 liters for laundry, 10 liters for toilets, and 5 liters for faucets, based on standard usage assumptions” (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 4.2: Water Savings Calculations).
Thus, showers in guest rooms (Option A) are likely to consume the most water in this context.
Reference:EDGE User Guide Version 2.1, Section 5.2: Water Efficiency Measures; EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 4.2: Water Savings Calculations.

The EDGE App relies on location-specific climate data to calculate resource savings, but not all cities are listed. The EDGE User Guide provides guidance for such cases: “If the project city is not listed in the EDGE App, the user should choose the closest city to the project location that is available in the database. If necessary, the user can edit the climate data (e.g., temperature, humidity) to better reflect the project’s actual conditions, ensuring accurate calculations” (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.2: Project Setup). Option B, choose the closest city and edit the climate data if necessary, directly matches this protocol. Option A (write to EDGE Certifier and wait) is incorrect, as this is not a required step: “Users are not required to request new cities; they can proceed by selecting the closest city” (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.2: Project Setup). Option C(select any city in the same climate zone globally) is too broad and inaccurate: “Choosing a city from a different region, even in the same climate zone, may lead to incorrect assumptions about local practices and climate” (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 3.2: Climate Data Inputs). Option D (choose the capital city) is also incorrect unless it is the closest: “The capital city should only be selected if it is the nearest available option in the database” (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.2: Project Setup). Thus, the correct protocol is to choose the closest city and edit climate data (Option B).
Reference:EDGE User Guide Version 2.1, Section 2.2: Project Setup; EDGE Methodology Report Version
2.0, Section 3.2: Climate Data Inputs.

The EDGE software uses a simplified approach to calculate energy consumption, focusing on accessibility and speed for users in emerging markets. The EDGE Methodology Report explains the calculation method:
“Energy consumption in EDGE is calculated using steady state calculations, which assume constant conditions over a period to estimate energy use for heating, cooling, lighting, and other systems. This method simplifies the modeling process while providing sufficiently accurate results for the purposes of EDGE certification” (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.2: Energy Calculation Methods). Option B, steady state calculations, directly matches this approach. Option A (hourly simulation) is incorrect, as EDGE does not use dynamic simulations: “EDGE does not employ hourly simulations, which are more complex and resource-intensive, as the goal is to provide a fast and simple tool” (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.1: EDGE Software Overview). Option C (quasi-steady state calculations) is also incorrect, as EDGE does not use this intermediate method: “Quasi-steady state methods, which account for some dynamic effects, are not used in EDGE to maintain simplicity” (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.2: Energy Calculation Methods). Option D (cooling and heating degree days) is a metric used to estimate climate impact, not the calculation method: “Degree days are inputs to the steady state calculations, not the method itself” (EDGE User Guide, Section 3.2: Climate Data Inputs). Thus, steady state calculations (Option B) are used for energy consumption in EDGE.
Reference:EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 5.2: Energy Calculation Methods; EDGE User Guide Version 2.1, Section 2.1: EDGE Software Overview, Section 3.2: Climate Data Inputs.

The EDGE certification process assigns clear responsibilities to various stakeholders to ensure a smooth and accountable process. The EDGE Certification Protocol defines the role of the ProjectOwner (also referred to as the EDGE Client): “The Project Owner, as the EDGE Client, is responsible for the entire project within the EDGE certification system. This includes providing all necessary project documentation (e.g., drawings, specifications, and self-assessments), ensuring access to the site for audits, and paying the audit and certification fees as required by the Certification Provider” (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 2.1: Roles and Responsibilities). Option C, Project Owner, directly aligns with this comprehensive responsibility. Option A (EDGE Expert) is incorrect, as the Expert’s role is advisory: “The EDGE Expert provides consultancy services, assisting with documentation and measure selection, but the ultimate responsibility for submission and payment lies with the Project Owner” (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.1: Roles of EDGE Expert). Option B (EDGE Auditor) is also incorrect, as the Auditor’s role is to verify compliance, not manage the project: “The EDGE Auditor conducts independent audits and is not responsible for project management, documentation provision, or fee payments” (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.2: Roles of EDGE Auditor). Option D (EDGE Certification Provider) is responsible for issuing certificates and overseeing the process, not managing the project: “The EDGE Certification Provider, such as GBCI, reviews the Auditor’s recommendation and issues certificates, but does not manage the project or pay fees” (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.3: Certification Decision). The EDGE User Guide further reinforces this:
“The Project Owner must coordinate all aspects of the certification process, ensuring documentation is complete, site access is granted for post-construction audits, and all fees are paid to the Certification Provider in a timely manner” (EDGE User Guide, Section 6.1: Project Preparation). This holistic responsibility makes the Project Owner (Option C) the correct answer.
Reference:EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 2.1: Roles and Responsibilities, Section 3.3: Certification Decision; EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.1: Roles of EDGE Expert, Section 2.2: Roles of EDGE Auditor; EDGE User Guide Version 2.1, Section 6.1: Project Preparation.

Wastewater treatment and recycling systems are evaluated in EDGE for their potential to reduce water consumption, a key aspect of green building design. The EDGE User Guide highlights the varying water usage patterns across building typologies: “Hotels typically have high water consumption due to guest rooms, laundry, and amenities like pools, making them ideal candidates for wastewater treatment and recycling systems, which can significantly reduce potable water demand by reusing treated water for non-potable uses such as irrigation and flushing” (EDGE User Guide, Section 5.2: Water Efficiency Measures). In contrast, homes (Option A) and offices (Option D) generally have lower per-capita water use, and schools (Option C) have intermittent occupancy, reducing the overall impact of such systems. The EDGE Methodology Report further supports this, noting: “For hotels, greywater and blackwater recycling can achieve up to 40% water savings due to high occupancy and consistent demand, compared to 20-25% in homes or offices” (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 4.2: Water Savings Calculations). Thus, hotels (Option B) benefit the most from wastewater treatment and recycling systems due to their high water usage andpotential for significant savings.
Reference:EDGE User Guide Version 2.1, Section 5.2: Water Efficiency Measures; EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 4.2: Water Savings Calculations.

During a site visit for post-construction certification, the EDGE Auditor relies on specific tools to verify compliance. The EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols specify: “The primary resource for an EDGE Auditor during a site visit is the EDGE Auditor’s checklist, which provides a structured list of items to verify, including the implementation of selected measures, alignment with the self-assessment, and compliance with EDGE standards” (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 4.4: Site Audit Procedures). Option C, EDGE Auditor’s checklist, matches this description as the key resource guiding the audit process. Option A (EDGE software) is a tool for assessment, not a resource for the site visit: “The EDGE software is used for self-assessment and desk audits, not directly during site visits” (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.2:
Audit Requirements). Option B (roof insulation U-value) and Option D (Window to Wall Ratio) are specific data points the Auditor may verify, not primary resources: “U-values and WWR are elements to check, not tools for the Auditor” (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 4.4: Site Audit Procedures). The checklist ensures all aspects of the project are systematically reviewed, making it the primary resource (Option C).
Reference:EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 4.4: Site Audit Procedures; EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.2: Audit Requirements.

The role of the EDGE Auditor in the certification process is strictly defined to ensure independence and objectivity. The EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols state: “The EDGE Auditor’s primary role in the certification process is to conduct an independent audit of the project’s self-assessment and supporting documentation, providing a recommendation for certification to the Certification Provider based on compliance with EDGE standards” (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.2: Roles of EDGE Auditor). Option C, recommendation for certification, aligns with this responsibility. Option A (building design services) and Option D (recommendation of materials and building systems) are incorrect, as these are roles of the EDGE Expert or design team, not the Auditor: “Auditors do not provide design services or recommend materials; their role is to verify, not advise” (EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.3:
Conflict of Interest). Option B (approval of the building design) is also incorrect, as Auditors do not approve designs but assess compliance: “Final approval of certification is granted by the Certification Provider, not the Auditor” (EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.1: Certification Process). Thus, the Auditor provides a recommendation for certification (Option C).
Reference: EDGE Expert and Auditor Protocols, Section 2.2: Roles of EDGE Auditor, Section 2.3: Conflict of Interest; EDGE Certification Protocol, Section 3.1: Certification Process.

Insulation materials in EDGE are evaluated for their thermal performance and embodied energy as part of materials efficiency measures. The EDGE User Guide lists common insulation options: “In EDGE, insulation materials for walls, roofs, and floors include mineral wool, polyurethane,polystyrene, and fiberglass, which are selected for their low thermal conductivity and availability in most markets” (EDGE User Guide, Section
7.2: Materials Efficiency Measures). Options A (mineral wool), B (polyurethane), and D (polystyrene) are explicitly mentioned as insulation materials in EDGE. Option C, polypropylene, is not listed as an insulation material, as confirmed by the EDGE Methodology Report: “Polypropylene is a plastic material often used in packaging or pipes, but it is not recognized in EDGE as an insulation material due to its poor thermal resistance compared to standard insulation options like polystyrene or polyurethane” (EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 6.1: Embodied Energy in Materials). The EDGE software’s material database further excludes polypropylene from insulation options, focusing instead on materials with established thermal properties for building envelopes. Thus, polypropylene (Option C) is not an insulation option in EDGE.
Reference:EDGE User Guide Version 2.1, Section 7.2: Materials Efficiency Measures; EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 6.1: Embodied Energy in Materials.

Utility cost savings in EDGE are calculated based on reductions in resource consumption sourced from the supply grid, as these are the costs directly borne by the building owner. The EDGE User Guide explains:
“Utility cost savings in EDGE are calculated based on the reduction in energy and water consumption from the supply grid, using local tariffs for electricity and water to convert resource savings into financial savings” (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.4: Interpreting EDGE Results). Option D, energy and water consumption from the supply grid, aligns with this definition, focusing on grid-supplied resources. Option A (electricity and water consumption) is partially correct but lacks specificity about the source: “Electricity and water must be grid-supplied to be included in utility cost savings; onsite generation is excluded” (EDGE Methodology Report Version2.0, Section 4.4: Cost Savings Calculations). Option B (generator fuel and water consumption) is incorrect, as generator fuel is not part of utility cost savings: “Generator fuel costs are not included in utility savings, as EDGE focuses on grid-supplied utilities” (EDGE User Guide, Section 2.4: Interpreting EDGE Results). Option C (building energy and water consumption) is too broad, including onsite sources: “Building consumption includes all sources, but utility savings are grid-specific” (EDGE Methodology Report Version
2.0, Section 4.4: Cost Savings Calculations). Thus, energy and water from the supply grid (Option D) is the correct basis for utility cost savings.
Reference:EDGE User Guide Version 2.1, Section 2.4: Interpreting EDGE Results; EDGE Methodology Report Version 2.0, Section 4.4: Cost Savings Calculations.